Much attention has been given to recent efforts by the government
to catch and prosecute individuals who fail to report offshore accounts and
income. In a well-publicized example, a widow inherited a Swiss bank account of
approximately $45 million, which she failed to report following her husband’s
death. When discovered, she agreed to pay a penalty of $22 million to the
government and still faced criminal prosecution.
For some time, US tax return filers have been required to answer a
question about their foreign accounts. While having a foreign bank account is
not illegal, failure to report them can be.
For many years, US persons with foreign financial accounts
aggregating more than $10,000 in value have been required to file a Foreign
Bank Account Report (FBAR). More recently, an additional set of reporting
requirements using Form 8938 have come into play. The potential penalties for
failing to file either form can be enormous.
Under these programs, taxpayers could pay a special fixed
penalty in addition to any regular tax, interest, and late filing or late
payment penalties due. The amount of this special penalty, called an “Offshore
Penalty” by the IRS was smaller than the maximum penalties that could have been
assessed. Most recently, the Offshore Penalty was 27.5% of the highest value of
unreported assets during a six-year period. The amount of the Offshore Penalty
was not negotiable or subject to reduction except in certain very limited
situations.
Eligibility for these programs was dependent upon first receiving
a letter from the criminal division of the Justice Department stating that
criminal prosecution was not going to be pursued. For taxpayers, satisfying the
requirements of the programs was difficult and the IRS was apparently having a
hard time processing the requests.
For example, suppose Miya was given stock in her father’s company
in Asia and had a bank account created for her in her home country. Miya went
to a return preparer who did not ask questions about foreign assets so the
existence of the foreign stock and foreign bank accounts was unreported. Miya
had no idea that she needed to report the foreign account or stock.
In addition to a reduced offshore penalty, the streamlined program
typically requires filing fewer amended tax returns, but payment of all taxes,
interest and penalties, including the 5% offshore penalty is required at the
time of application for the program. While applying for the program is not for
the faint of heart, it can be better than the alternatives.
In addition to the new streamlined procedures for some non-willful
violators, the IRS has also upped the ante for some violators. For those that
have unreported accounts with one of a number of overseas institutions that are
currently cooperating with the IRS, the penalties got worse. For such persons,
the offshore penalty has been increased from 27.5% to 50%. Clearly, the IRS is
trying to encourage violators to come forward before the IRS finds about the
accounts from other sources.
There are transitional rules for those who have unresolved
applications submitted under the prior versions of the program.
If you have questions about this, please contact Newland &
Associates.
Copyright 2014
Published by the law firm of Newland &
Associates, PLC
9835 Business Way
Manassas, VA 20110
Call us at (703) 330-0000 for a full range of business
law and
tax-related services.
While designed to be accurate, this publication is not intended to constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, or other professional services or to serve as a substitute for such services.
Redistribution or other commercial use of the material contained in Newland's Business Notes is expressly prohibited without the written permission of Newland & Associates, PLC.
Return to Newsletter List
Return to Content Index
Home Page