After our
last newsletter went to press, the IRS announced yet another, potentially significant,
set of revisions to its Offer in Compromise (OIC) program. The goal of the
latest changes is to make the OIC program more widely available.
In a
nutshell, the most important of these changes are the following:
Perhaps a
recognition of the rigidity of the prior rules and their implementation has
produced new, surprisingly liberal guidelines for the analysis of OICs. These
changes are reflected in new rules for the Financial Analysis of Offers, as set
forth in the Internal Revenue Manual.
In
evaluating Offers, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) looks at the value of
assets, called “Asset Equity Table,” as well as the stream of future income,
referred to as the “Income/Expense Table.” The purpose of computing assets and
income is to include in the Offer the Reasonable Collection Potential (RCP)
based upon these two factors: (1) equity
in assets and (2) income.
Previously,
the guidelines required including income or cash flow over 48 or 60 months (or,
in some cases the remainder of the ten-year collection period) if the OIC was
not to be paid in a lump sum. Now the
IRS has reduced the period of time over which cash flow payments are to be
calculated to one or two years, depending upon whether the Offer is paid in
five or fewer months.
For example,
assuming no equity in assets and available cash flow of $5,000, the total
income for one year would be $60,000. If
that $60,000 could be paid in five or fewer months then the OIC may be
accepted. If it cannot be paid in five
or fewer months, then the Offer would have to include $120,000 payable over up
to 24 months.
Previously,
the IRS insisted on the inclusion in the Offer of 80% of the value of all
assets, the so called Quick Sale Value. Now, for some assets, the approach is
markedly different. The IRS states that
if an asset is producing income, the income from the asset, but not the
equity, should be included in the reasonable collection potential for the OIC.
A quick
example: If a machine worth $100,000 with no debt produces $5,000 of income per
month, then only the income of $5,000 per month but not the equity in the
machine itself should be included in the OIC.
In the past
all cash had to be included in an OIC without any reductions. The new guidance
surprisingly permits $1,000 of cash to be subtracted from a bank and or savings
account. In addition, certain living expenses can also be excluded from cash.
The example contained in the new guidelines is $10,000 of cash should be
reduced by the $1,000 and living expenses of $3,000 also, leaving cash of only
$6,000 to be included in the OIC. This is a welcome change for those trying to
get an OIC accepted.
Under the
new financial guidelines, $3,450 per car can be excluded in projecting the
equity in assets of a car. If a family has two cars, they can exclude up to
$6,900. The new rules do not apply to airplanes, boats, and trucks. The issue
of what to do with a pickup truck, which may be the only vehicle in some
families, is not addressed in the new guidance.
Previously,
there could be no deductions, generally, for student loans not being repaid.
Now, in certain cases, there can be a reduction (expense) factored into assumed
cash flow. Also, state and local taxes were never deductible in the past when computing
cash flow for an OIC, but now an allocation formula can be used to claim a
portion of those taxes as expenses when computing available cash flow.
There are
also potentially significant changes in the way the IRS will treat dissipated
assets (assets transferred for less than fair market value).
If
implemented reasonably, the new guidelines could make OICs more affordable and
available for more taxpayers.
To
read a more detailed article about the
Guidelines for OICs, click here.
Copyright 2012
Published by the law firm of Newland &
Associates, PLC
9835 Business Way
Manassas, VA 20110
Call us at (703) 330-0000 for a full range of business
law and
tax-related services.
While designed to be accurate, this publication is not intended to constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, or other professional services or to serve as a substitute for such services.
Redistribution or other commercial use of the material contained in Newland's Business Notes is expressly prohibited without the written permission of Newland & Associates, PLC.
Return to Newsletter List
Return to Content Index
Home Page