Some law firms seem to operate,
whether intentionally or not, in a manner that has the effect of generating two,
or more, sets of legal fees for the estate of one person.
For some attorneys, including
our firm, and some other firms, the goal of estate planning for a married couple
with moderate to substantial wealth is to get the bulk of the estate into two
revocable living trusts (RLTs). Such RLTs (a) avoid or reduce probate related
fees, (b) allow proper use of the marital deduction in order to avoid estate tax
at the death of the first spouse (regardless of the size of the estate), and (c)
allow structured distributions to beneficiaries.
Avoiding probate costs is a
major concern in many states. Probate is a judicially supervised system to
handle the affairs of decedents, whether or not they have a will.
In
Conversely, in a well planned
estate, most of the assets will avoid probate by passing through an RLT. This
means minimal probate fees, and little need for expensive legal services.
Unfortunately, this often does not happen.
Suppose Dewey, Cheatham &
Howe (DCH) is a law firm operating in many areas of the
1. Complicated Will – DCH can
prepare lengthy and complex Wills with testamentary trust provisions. For
reasons stated in our newsletter, “Trusts in Wills: Too Costly,”
January/February 2005 (available on our website, www.tax-business.com),
this often increases probate costs and legal fees.
Wills with testamentary trusts
require probate of all family assets, plus recurring probate fees for the
testamentary trust. Usually
testamentary trusts require annual reporting and the payment of probate and
attorney fees for as long as the testamentary trusts last, which can be many
years.
2. Unfunded RLTs – DCH can
create an opportunity for charging two fees by creating RLTs for clients but
putting nothing into them. One firm in
3. Revocable Life Insurance
Trust – DCH’s
Focusing the trust only on life
insurance leaves the other assets outside the RLIT.
The Wills which usually accompany RLITs generally say that all assets
will go into the RLIT after probate. The effect of this is to require
most assets (other than the insurance proceeds) to go through probate and then
into the RLIT. By so doing, the
trust companies and the attorneys get two sets of fees; one for handling the
probate estate and a second fee for drafting and handling the RLIT.
Are these methods illegal? The
answer is “no,” but such estate planning is usually not in the best interest
of the family. This needless probate is often not discussed with or known by the
family until they first become aware of it after the first spouse dies.
Copyright 2009
Published by the law firm of Newland & Associates, PLC
9835 Business Way
Manassas, VA 20110
Call us at (703) 330-0000 for a full range of business law and
tax-related services.
While designed to be accurate, this publication is not intended to constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, or other professional services or to serve as a substitute for such services.
Redistribution or other commercial use of the material contained in Newland's Business Notes is expressly prohibited without the written permission of Newland & Associates, PLC.
Return to Newsletter List
Return to Content Index
Home Page